Detailed Terrain and Accessibility Analysis-Beringia

Play Video
Beringia Terrain and Accessibility Analysis

Beringia 500 km analysis zone · 22,000–11,000 BP · 100-year intervals

Central question
When was Beringia a land connection between Asia and Alaska, and how much ice-free land remained available, and for how long?

During the last glacial period, lower sea level exposed a broad continental shelf now submerged beneath the Bering Sea. To evaluate the possibility that some ancestors of Native Americans lived in this region for thousands of years, it is necessary to examine not only whether a land bridge existed, but also how exposed land, ice cover, ice-free land, coastlines, and connectivity changed through time.

Analysis Scope

The map is centered on Diomede, Alaska (65.76°N, 168.95°W). The 500 km analysis boundary is a 500,000 m buffer constructed in the Beringia True LAEA analysis CRS; it is not generated in the web map. It is transformed to a continuous 0–360° longitude arrangement only for Pacific-centered display across the International Date Line. Provideniya and Anadyr are shown to the west, and Wales and Nome to the east. The boundary explains the analytical mask; it is not a reconstructed paleocoastline.

Use Ctrl + mouse wheel over the map to zoom.

CenterDiomede, central Bering Strait
Spatial extentBeringia analysis zone within 500 km of the center
Map coordinatesPacific-centered 0–360° longitude display; analysis calculated on a 4 km True LAEA equal-area grid
Main period22,000–11,000 BP at 100-year intervals
Connectivity focus12,000–8,000 BP, including the last connected point at 9,900 BP and first disconnected point at 9,800 BP
Long-term trend500-year centered moving average

Variables

The variables are read in five groups. Exposed land is all ground above sea level, while ice-free land is the portion not covered by modeled ice. Ice indicators describe its area, share, and thickness. Coastal indicators describe coastline length and the relative share of coastal grid cells. Connectivity and century-scale change show whether an uninterrupted route existed and how rapidly land and ice changed from one 100-year point to the next.

Variable groupIndicatorsPlain-language meaning
Land extentExposed land and ice-free landLand above sea level and the portion not covered by ice
IceCovered area, share, mean and maximum thicknessHow much ice existed and how thick it was
CoastCoastline length and coastal-cell area shareHow prominent the land–sea boundary became
AccessibilityLand and effective ice-free connectionWhether an uninterrupted route linked Asia and Alaska
Rate of changeLand loss and gain, ice loss, and newly ice-free landHow rapidly the surface was reorganized from one century to the next

Data: The analysis uses a CHELSA-TraCE21k paleotopographic (orog) foundation on a 4 km True LAEA grid together with corrected ice extent and thickness layers. CHELSA-TraCE21k also supports the climate analyses in the wider project, but the ice, coastline, and connectivity measures shown here are derived spatial statistics rather than CHELSA climate variables.

Time Series and Interpretation by Indicator

Exposed Land Area

What does this indicator measure?

The total area of Beringian land above sea level. It does not yet distinguish whether the land was covered by ice.

How to read the chart

The blue series shows 100-year area values, the dark line shows the 500-year centered average, and the orange series shows land lost since the previous 100-year point.

Observed result

Exposed land declined from about 809.6 thousand km² at 22,000 BP to 459.8 thousand km² at 11,000 BP, a loss of about 349.7 thousand km² or 43.2%.

Environmental meaning

Beringia remained a substantial physical space, but rising sea level greatly reduced it, particularly late in the period.

Limitation

Exposed land is not equivalent to habitable land. Ice, climate, snow, vegetation, water, and productivity must also be considered.

Ice-Free Land Area

What does this indicator measure?

The portion of exposed land not covered by modeled ice. It is an upper limit on potentially usable ground, not a direct measure of habitability.

How to read the chart

The lighter line shows the 100-year values and the dark line shows the 500-year centered average.

Observed result

Ice-free land measured about 796.8 thousand km² at 22,000 BP and 459.8 thousand km² at 11,000 BP. After modeled ice disappears at 15,000 BP, ice-free and exposed land have the same area.

Environmental meaning

Most of the study zone was not buried beneath a continental ice sheet. Later contraction resulted from inundation rather than expanding ice.

Limitation

Ice-free does not mean warm, vegetated, productive, or supplied with adequate food and fuel.

Ice-Covered Land Area

What does this indicator measure?

The area of exposed land classified as ice-covered within the study zone.

How to read the chart

The ice-colored series and dark average show ice-covered area; the orange series shows area lost since the previous century.

Observed result

Ice covered about 12.8 thousand km² at 22,000 BP. After a final major retreat, modeled regional ice cover is zero from 15,000 BP onward.

Environmental meaning

Ice directly constrained only a limited part of the Beringia study zone and ceased to do so as deglaciation proceeded.

Limitation

A 4 km grid may not fully represent small mountain or valley glaciers.

Ice-Covered Share of Exposed Land

What does this indicator measure?

The percentage of exposed land covered by modeled ice.

How to read the chart

This is a share rather than an absolute area. It should be read together with changing exposed-land area.

Observed result

The share was about 1.58% at 22,000 BP, reached only about 1.6% at its maximum, and is zero from 15,000 BP onward.

Environmental meaning

More than roughly 98% of exposed land was ice-free even during the central LGM.

Limitation

A low regional average does not rule out substantial local ice barriers.

Mean Ice Thickness

What does this indicator measure?

The mean thickness calculated only across cells classified as ice-covered; ice-free cells are excluded.

How to read the chart

The 100-year values and 500-year average are plotted together. Thickness becomes zero when no ice-covered cells remain.

Observed result

Mean thickness was about 253 m at 22,000 BP, peaked around 17,500 BP, and falls to zero at 15,000 BP.

Environmental meaning

Although ice occupied little area, ice-covered locations could contain hundreds of meters of ice and create local barriers.

Limitation

This is not average thickness across all Beringian land.

Maximum Ice Thickness

What does this indicator measure?

The thickest modeled ice cell within the study zone at each time point.

How to read the chart

Unlike the mean, this is a local extreme and represents the largest modeled barrier rather than typical conditions.

Observed result

Maximum thickness was about 660 m at 22,000 BP and declines to zero by 15,000 BP.

Environmental meaning

Substantial local barriers could exist even while most of the study zone remained ice-free.

Limitation

A maximum is sensitive to a single cell and should not be treated as representative of all Beringia.

Coastline Length

What does this indicator measure?

The total modeled boundary between land and sea calculated on the 4 km grid.

How to read the chart

The 100-year values and 500-year average show how the boundary changed as the shelf was flooded.

Observed result

Coastline length increased from about 1,031 km at 22,000 BP to about 5,590 km at 11,000 BP.

Environmental meaning

As a broad shelf plain was inundated, islands, bays, and peninsulas created a more complex boundary and made coastal settings relatively more prominent.

Limitation

Coastline length is highly sensitive to grid resolution. A longer coast does not prove greater marine productivity or coastal use.

Coastal-Cell Area Share

What does this indicator measure?

The percentage of exposed land represented by 4 km cells adjacent to the sea.

How to read the chart

Higher values mean that coastal cells account for a larger share of the remaining exposed land.

Observed result

The share rose from about 1.88% at 22,000 BP to about 14.29% at 11,000 BP and reached about 14.58% at 11,200 BP.

Environmental meaning

As land contracted and its boundary became more complex, the relative importance of coastal settings increased sharply.

Limitation

A coastal cell is a grid category and is not identical to the full ecological reach of coastal influence.

Asia–Alaska Land Connection

What does this indicator measure?

A binary state showing whether uninterrupted land connected Asia and Alaska within the defined corridor.

How to read the chart

The chart focuses on 12,000–8,000 BP. The state is connected through 9,900 BP and first becomes disconnected at 9,800 BP.

Observed result

Every 100-year point from 22,000 to 11,000 BP is connected. The extended series first becomes disconnected at 9,800 BP.

Environmental meaning

The Bering Land Bridge remained physically continuous throughout the main environmental analysis period.

Limitation

The result depends on the corridor, four-neighbor grid rule, paleotopography, and sea-level model. It does not prove human passage.

Effective Asia–Alaska Ice-Free Connection

What does this indicator measure?

A state requiring both physical land connection and a continuous route after ice-covered cells are excluded.

How to read the chart

The report corrects the original field using: Effective ice-free connection = Land connection AND Ice-free connection. The chart focuses on 12,000–8,000 BP.

Observed result

Effective ice-free connection persists through 9,900 BP and closes with the physical land connection at 9,800 BP.

Environmental meaning

Local ice did not block the entire route between Asia and Alaska during the main analysis period.

Limitation

A grid connection does not describe route width, terrain difficulty, snow cover, food, or actual human movement.

Land Lost and Gained Since the Previous 100 Years

What does this indicator measure?

The areas that became sea and those newly exposed between consecutive 100-year time points, summed separately by location.

How to read the chart

Loss is plotted below zero and gain above zero so both directions remain visible.

Observed result

Long-term loss greatly exceeded gain. Individual late-period losses reached several thousand to more than 10,000 km²; the loss at 11,100 BP was about 10,567 km².

Environmental meaning

Beringia contracted through a series of uneven century-scale losses rather than at one uniform rate.

Limitation

These are spatial loss and gain totals, not simply the difference between two total areas, and they are sensitive to small shoreline shifts.

Ice Retreat and Newly Ice-Free Land

What does this indicator measure?

The decline in ice-covered area and the land that actually changed from ice-covered to ice-free since the previous century.

How to read the chart

When the two series overlap, lost ice area corresponds directly to land newly released from ice.

Observed result

The last major change occurs around 15,000 BP. Both values remain zero afterward.

Environmental meaning

After about 15,000 BP, the dominant change in available land was flooding rather than regional ice retreat.

Limitation

Newly ice-free ground would not necessarily support vegetation or animals immediately; ecological recovery may lag.

Summary by Environmental Phase

IntervalTerrain and ice statePlain-language interpretation
22,000–20,000 BPNear-maximum land area, continuous connection, limited regional iceA broad land bridge was exposed and most of it was not ice-covered.
19,900–15,100 BPConnection maintained, changing ice area and thickness, gradual coastline growthThe land bridge persisted while its coasts and local ice geometry were reorganized.
15,000 BPRegional ice cover changes to zeroThe final modeled ice disappears from the study zone, although ecological recovery is a separate question.
14,900–11,000 BPIce-free connection maintained, accelerating land loss, increasing coastal complexityThe route remained open, but total land area contracted rapidly and coastal settings became more prominent.

What the Next Analysis Must Establish

Terrain connectivity alone cannot explain the potential for long-term residence. The next stage must analyze temperature, precipitation, snow-cover duration, NPP, LAI, and Biome composition on the same 22,000–11,000 BP timeline to evaluate ecological constraints and relative stability.

Data and Interpretive Limitations

  • Terrain and ice values depend on reconstructed data and the 4 km analysis grid.
  • Connectivity depends on the Diomede-centered corridor and the four-neighbor grid rule.
  • Coastline length and coastal-cell share are sensitive to spatial resolution.
  • The 500-year moving average is a trend aid, not a new observation.
  • Land or ice-free connectivity does not directly demonstrate human movement or residence.
blank
Trump Cancels Planned Strike: Maximum Pressure or Deceptive Tactics?
blank
Historical Indigenous Territories and Ancient DNA in the Americas
blank
MIS 3–Early MIS 2 Eurasia Temperature Map (58–22 ka BP)
blank
From Environment to Ancestry: Native American Origins | EP.02
blank
[ANALYSIS] The Valdai Gambit: Did an Alleged Drone Strike on Putin’s Estate Just Derail the Mar-a-Lago Peace Initiative?
Ice Age Beringia around 22,000 years ago compared with Chukotka, Yana and Alaska, showing tundra-steppe, ice-free land and northern climate conditions
22,000 Years Ago: Why Beringia? | EP.02
blank
What Was Beringia? | Native American Ancestors in Beringia EP.02
The purged Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission Zhang Youxia and Chief of Staff of the Joint Staff Department Liu Zhenli
[Deep Dive] The Downfall of Zhang Youxia: Xi Abandons 'Personality' for the 'System'
blank
13,300–12,600 Years Ago: The Environmental Center Shifts East | EP.02
blank
How We Reconstructed the Beringian Environment | EP.02